Divorce Consulting
Is a divorce looming? Or have you already been served divorce
papers? Would you like to prevent divorce and save your marriage?
At this time, the spouse who wants to preserve the marriage essentially
has no voice in the process. In addition, the court process no
longer makes judgments about who has breached the contract or inquires
into the viability of the marriage, other than asking the Petitioning
spouse whether he/she believes the marriage is "irretrievably boken". Divorce is now a level playing field, which means
that no matter what you did - either keeping your vows or breaking them
- is a non-issue. The judge is not interested about the "facts".
Nor - in most cases - will it affect the outcome of who gets "custody"
of the children or how the property is divided. When no-fault laws were
enacted, the issue of "fault" became a moot point, except
in a few states where they claim to have "fault-based" grounds
for divorce, but in reality, lawyers in those jurisdictions have clever ways to
get around them. In some jurisdictions, "fault" may have a
slight bearing on the settlement outcome.
In reality, divorce has been established as a right of the petitioning spouse, because no-fault divorces are never denied.
Most people believed that no-fault divorce was introduced as an enlightened reofrm that would allow marriages to be
dissolved with more dignity and less blame. And most people also believe
that no-fault divorce is usually obtained through a mutual process
- that both spouses have negotiated an end to the marriage. But
the truth is that about 80% of divorces are unilateral - that only one of the spouses is pursuing a divorce. The spouse wanting to save the marriage
is shut out of the process. And if any wrongdoing took place, the courts
take no position - and don't want to know about it. The
spouse who is being divorced has no real forum for presenting his/her views. The current
law mandates judges to acquiesce to the divorce-petitioner and grant the
divorce. Judges have essentially had their hands tied by the law--but on the same note, they appear to operate
willingly as they trample rights and carry out an unconstitutional process, which can also violate religious agreements
and tear families apart when they could be saved.
The role of the judge is merely "ministerial" - the judge is there to just administer a predetermined outcome - every divorce is granted -
and the judge's main role is then to oversee (or impose) the " settlements" concerning property, child custody, etc.
You may argue in court that
divorce will harm your children - as research has increasingly revealed - and that your problems can be resolved. But a judge will not -
and essentially cannot - waver from the role of "divorce administrator".
If you have hired a lawyer, his/her sole role is to get the best "settlement"
for you. Lawyers previous role - before no-fault - was to defend against the divorce.
Divorce is popularly viewed as the "solution" - at least by one spouse in the marriage. Divorce has become
so common in our society that it is nearly viewed as a "normative"
event - like a "natural" part of the life cycle. But many
people are beginning to see through the deception, becoming more aware
of the harm that divorce causes to both individuals and society.
All we need to do is read the daily news stories about violent crimes
and see the thread running through most of these stories of divorce
or family-alienation.
If you want to learn more about how no-fault divorce was instituted,
read Stolen Vows.
The information provided here would like to offer more encouragement about stopping the legal process,
but the truth is, the deck is stacked against you - and the sooner you recognize this, the better. If you were married in a church, you need to go back there to obtain
moral support. Your church should be an important resource if you received their blessing, but too
often, church leaders are too busy to help or do not know what to do. Most important, if a couple was married in a religious ceremony, their marriage
should be considered "hands-off" by the civil courts - at least until church leadership has first been able to consult with the one who is initiating the action.
As the "respondent" in a divorce case, you will need to read all you can about the process and if you object to what is happening, you need to make that clear on the "record".